Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
Supply Chain Risk

ERM-GRC: Why Speed of Implementation Matters | Mitratech Holdings, Inc

When implementing new software, sometimes there are overages. Even with stakeholders or key decision-makers determining necessary features during a preliminary stage, a desired project budget can be exceeded during the development phase.

This can be as a result of:

  • Unexpected conditions
  • Unrealistic requirements
  • Software selection that’s a bad fit for your business

Another challenge is a lack of cross-functional buy-in. When it comes to implementing an ERM-GRC (Enterprise Risk Management/Governance Risk Compliance) software managing collaboration between departments can be problematic. Resistance and apathy are major project risks due to fear of change or imposition and a lack of understanding of the rationale for the project.

Additionally, there can be hidden costs associated with implementation, such as:

  • Hardware and additional software changes
  • Extra operational resources
  • Additional security
  • Upgrades, patches and fixes
  • IT team training
  • Data management

No matter how much you plan, go-live dates can slip.  As the development phase progresses, requirements often expand and necessitate new features, or a project proves more difficult than initially anticipated. These setbacks can lead to a creep that inevitably delays an estimated delivery timeline.

Finally, the culmination of all these problems is that your IT team may lose their passion, setting back a project by weeks or even months. This can be due to:

  • Unclear motivation
  • Unclear goals and timelines
  • Overwhelming goals
  • Unclear communication throughout the organization
  • New, competing priorities and projects

Fast and successful ERC software implementation

Related posts

Trading Jose Quintana is the move to make

scceu

Virtual event series spotlights risk assessment, management

scceu

Warm and wild: Three ways La Niña will mess with our summer

scceu