By Dr. Larry Lapide ·
March 3, 2020
There has been a lot of hype about the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It’s not the first time around the block for AI, and in the past, it didn’t get very far. That leads some people (including me) to wonder: Is now the time that AI will be embraced by corporations to significantly improve business performance? Or, is it “déjà vu all over again?” as the late, great New York Yankee catcher Yogi Berra quipped.
In this column, I’ll discuss my views on the usefulness of AI for business decision-making. They may be counter to what you’re reading in other articles, but they are colored by having watched the development of AI over the years. They also reflect my experiences as a technologist. Throughout my career, I’ve taken the position that technology merely enables business process improvement. Computers should be decision support systems (DSSs), but not necessarily make final decisions; those are best made by managers.
Of course, this doesn’t take away from the fact that many decisions, especially those without significant consequence, can be made without managerial intervention. Take inventory management, for example. An ABC Pareto analysis can help an inventory manager determine the best-stocked items on which to focus his or her time. “A” items may represent the fewest number of SKUs in stock, but they may also generate the largest share of revenue. Thus, they require a lot of a manager’s time to ensure that a computerized inventory management system doesn’t skimp on the amount of stock on the shelves. “B” items, meanwhile, represent a larger share of inventory, but less revenue. For those, the inventory manager can let the computer do most of the inventory management and intervene on an exception basis. Lastly are the “C” items that represent the largest number of SKUs, but the smallest share of revenue. A manager can put those on autopilot and let the system do the work, intervening only in a crisis. In this scenario, AI inventory management technology would be most useful for “C” items; but AI is less useful for “B” items and least useful for the all-important “A” items. Those rely on a manager’s experience.
A brief history of AI
I’ve spent most of my career around computers, and for years I’ve been intrigued by efforts to create systems that can replicate and improve upon human intelligence. IBM, for example, has been researching AI since the 1950s. That work led to the development of a chess-playing computer system known as Deep Blue that beat a reigning world chess champion in 1996; and, more recently, to Watson, a computer system capable of answering questions in natural language. In 2011, Watson beat the two most successful contestants of the TV game show Jeopardy.
By Dr. Larry Lapide ·
March 3, 2020
There has been a lot of hype about the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It’s not the first time around the block for AI, and in the past, it didn’t get very far. That leads some people (including me) to wonder: Is now the time that AI will be embraced by corporations to significantly improve business performance? Or, is it “déjà vu all over again?” as the late, great New York Yankee catcher Yogi Berra quipped.
In this column, I’ll discuss my views on the usefulness of AI for business decision-making. They may be counter to what you’re reading in other articles, but they are colored by having watched the development of AI over the years. They also reflect my experiences as a technologist. Throughout my career, I’ve taken the position that technology merely enables business process improvement. Computers should be decision support systems (DSSs), but not necessarily make final decisions; those are best made by managers.
Of course, this doesn’t take away from the fact that many decisions, especially those without significant consequence, can be made without managerial intervention. Take inventory management, for example. An ABC Pareto analysis can help an inventory manager determine the best-stocked items on which to focus his or her time. “A” items may represent the fewest number of SKUs in stock, but they may also generate the largest share of revenue. Thus, they require a lot of a manager’s time to ensure that a computerized inventory management system doesn’t skimp on the amount of stock on the shelves. “B” items, meanwhile, represent a larger share of inventory, but less revenue. For those, the inventory manager can let the computer do most of the inventory management and intervene on an exception basis. Lastly are the “C” items that represent the largest number of SKUs, but the smallest share of revenue. A manager can put those on autopilot and let the system do the work, intervening only in a crisis. In this scenario, AI inventory management technology would be most useful for “C” items; but AI is less useful for “B” items and least useful for the all-important “A” items. Those rely on a manager’s experience.
A brief history of AI
I’ve spent most of my career around computers, and for years I’ve been intrigued by efforts to create systems that can replicate and improve upon human intelligence. IBM, for example, has been researching AI since the 1950s. That work led to the development of a chess-playing computer system known as Deep Blue that beat a reigning world chess champion in 1996; and, more recently, to Watson, a computer system capable of answering questions in natural language. In 2011, Watson beat the two most successful contestants of the TV game show Jeopardy.
March 3, 2020
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don’t Miss Out!
Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
