Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
Procurement

Minnesota Applies Direct Procurement Tax to Captive Insurers | Stinson LLP

A small change to a tax form could have big consequences for Minnesota businesses that purchase insurance directly from captive insurers.

The Minnesota Department of Revenue recently revised Form IG255, the tax return filed for remitting the tax levied upon the premium for insurance directly procured from non-admitted insurers. Minnesota-headquartered insureds of captives are now expressly subject to the direct procurement tax if a licensed broker does not place the coverage. 

Under Minnesota law, an insured headquartered in Minnesota that directly (without the representation of a surplus lines broker) procures insurance from a non-admitted insurer must pay a Minnesota tax equal to 2% of the premiums paid. The revised tax return form now specifically identifies captives as non-admitted insurers for purposes of the tax. 

Minnesota’s insurance taxation statutes do not define what constitutes a captive in this context, and the text of the revised form does not provide explanation of what is considered a captive for purposes of this tax. Insureds directly procuring insurance from an insurer falling within the broad ambit of what constitutes a captive will need to evaluate each placement to determine whether a transaction is subject to the tax and to consider strategies for mitigating the tax.

Related posts

Principles on calculating additional price difference and assignment of contracts in public procurement were published

scceu

Logistics Business Outsourcing Market 2021 COVID 19 Impact Analysis, New Technology, Demand and Opportunity Top Companies Are Exel Logistics, FedEx, Ryder Logistics

scceu

Champion Bear Provides Default Status Report for Management Cease Trade Order TSX Venture Exchange:CBA

scceu