Foulger, G. R., Wilson, M. P., Gluyas, J. G., Julian, B. R. & Davies, R. J. Global review of human-induced earthquakes. Earth Sci. Rev. 178, 438–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.008 (2018).
Muntendam-Bos, A. G. et al. An overview of induced seismicity in the Netherlands. Neth. J. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.14 (2022).
Smith, D. C. & Richards, J. M. Social license to operate: Hydraulic fracturing-related challenges facing the oil & gas industry. Oil Gas Nat. Resour. Energy J. 1(2), 81–163 (2015).
Ghofrani, H., Atkinson, G. M., Schultz, R. & Assatourians, K. Short-term hindcasts of seismic hazard in the Western Canada sedimentary basin caused by induced and natural earthquakes. Seismol. Res. Let. 90(3), 1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180285 (2019).
Dong, L. & Luo, Q. Investigations and new insights on earthquake mechanics from fault slip experiments. Earth-Sci. Rev. 228, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104019 (2022).
Bommer, J. J. et al. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Eng. Geol. 83, 287–306 (2006).
Bommer, J. J., Crowley, H. & Pinho, R. A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity. J. Seismol. 19(2), 623–646 (2015).
Van Elk, J. et al. A probabilistic model to evaluate options for mitigating induced seismic risk. Earthq. Spectra 35(2), 537–564 (2019).
Schultz, R., Beroza, G. C., Ellsworth, W. L. & Baker, J. Risk-informed recommendations for managing hydraulic fracturing–induced seismicity via traffic light protocols. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110, 2411–2422 (2020).
Schultz, R., Beroza, G. C. & Ellsworth, W. L. A risk-based approach for managing hydraulic fracturing–induced seismicity. Science 372(6541), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5451 (2021).
Gulia, L., Tormann, T., Wiemer, S., Hermann, M. & Seif, S. Short-term probabilistic earthquake risk assessment considering time-dependent b values. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1100–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066686 (2016).
Muntendam-Bos, A. G., Roest, J. P. A. & De Waal, J. A. The effect of imposed production measures on gas extraction induced seismic risk. Neth. J. Geosci. 96(5), s271–s278. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.29 (2017).
Bachmann, C. E., Wiemer, S., Goertz-Allman, B. P. & Woessner, J. Influence of pore-pressure on the event-size distribution of induced earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051480 (2012).
Hiemer, S. & Kamer, Y. Improved seismicity forecast with spatially varying magnitude distribution. Seismol. Res. Let. 87(2A), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150182 (2016).
Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094 (2005).
Marzocchi, W., Spassiani, I., Stallone, A. & Taroni, M. How to be fooled searching for significant variations of the b-value. Geophys. J. Int. 220, 1845–1856. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz541 (2020).
Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times?. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 102(B7), 15115–15128. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB00726 (1997).
Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Mapping spatial variability of the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakes. Adv. Geophys. 45, 259–302 (2002).
Kamer, Y. Comment on “Systematic survey of high-resolution b-value imaging along Californian faults: Inference on asperities” by Tormann et al. J. Geophys. Res. 119(3), 2029–2054 (2014).
Kamer, Y. & Hiemer, S. Data-driven spatial b-value estimation with applications to California seismicity: To b or not to b. J. Geophys. Res. 120(7), 2191–5214 (2015).
Kagan, Y. Y. Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. Statistical results. Geophys. J. Int. 148, 520–541 (2002).
Dost, B., Ruigrok, E. & Spetzler, J. Development of seismicity and probabilistic hazard assessment for the Groningen gas field. Neth. J. Geosci. 96(5), s235–s245. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.20 (2017).
Holschneider, M., Zöller, G. & Hainzl, S. Estimation of the maximum possible magnitude in the framework of a doubly truncated Gutenberg-Richter model. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101(4), 1649–1659. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100289 (2011).
Bourne, S. J., Oates, S. J., van Elk, J. & Doornhof, D. A seismological model for earthquakes induced by fluid extraction from a subsurface reservoir. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 8991–9015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011663 (2014).
De Jager, J. & Visser, C. Geology of the Groningen field: An overview. Neth. J. Geosci. 95(5), s3–s15. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.22 (2017).
Candela, T. et al. Depletion-induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field: Coulomb rate-and-state models including differential compaction effect. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 7081–7104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016670 (2019).
Bommer, J. J. et al. Framework for a ground-motion model for induced seismic hazard and risk analysis in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands. Earthq. Spectra 33(2), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1193/082916EQS138M (2017).
Van der Voort, N. & Vanclay, F. Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Provinceof Groningen, The Netherlands. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 50, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.008 (2014).
Van Eck, T., Goudbeek, F., Haak, H. & Dost, B. Seismic hazard due to small-magnitude, shallow-source, induced earthquakes in The Netherlands. Eng. Geol. 87, 105–121 (2006).
Bourne, S. J. & Oates, S. J. Extreme threshold failures within a heterogeneous elastic thin-sheet and the spatial-temporal development of induced seismicity within the Groningen gas field. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 10299–10320. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014356 (2017).
Bourne, S. J., Oates, S. J. & Elk, J. V. The exponential rise of induced seismicity with increasing stress levels in the Groningen gas field and its implications for controlling seismic risk. Geophys. J. Int. 213, 1693–1700 (2018).
Bourne, S. J. & Oates, S. J. Stress-dependent magnitudes of induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020013 (2020).
Willacy, C. et al. Full-waveform event location and moment tensor inversion for induced seismicity. Geophysics 84(2), KS39–KS47. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2018-0212.1 (2019).
Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34(8), 185–188 (1944).
Aki, K. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N=a-bM and its confidence limits. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. (Tokyo) 43, 237–239 (1965).
Utsu, T. A method for determining the value of “b” in a formula log n= a-bm showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes. Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 13, 99–103 (1965).
Ogata, Y. & Yamashina, K. Unbiased estimate for b-value of magnitude frequency. J. Phys. Earth 34, 187–194 (1986).
Woessner, J. & Wiemer, S. Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(2), 684–698 (2005).
Schwarz, G. E. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 (1978).
Boslaugh, S. Statistics in a Nutshell (O’Reilly Media, 2012).
Bender, B. Maximum likelihood estimation of b-values for magnitude grouped data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73(3), 831–851 (1983).
Geffers, G.-M., Main, I. G. & Naylor, M. Biases in estimating b-values from small earthquake catalogues: How high are high b-values?. Geophys. J. Int. 229, 1840–1855. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac028 (2022).
Cavanaugh, J. E. Unifying the derivations of the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria. Stat. Probab. Lett. 31(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9 (1997).
Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods (C. Griffin, 1948).
Van der Elst, N. J., Page, M. T., Weiser, D. A., Goebel, T. H. W. & Hosseini, S. M. Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 4575–4590. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012818 (2016).
Muntendam-Bos, A. G. Clustering characteristics of gas-extraction induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field. Geophys. J. Int. 221, 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa038 (2020).
Muntendam-Bos, A. G. & De Waal, J.A. (2013) Reassessment of the probability of higher magnitude earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. SodM technical report (2013).
Beirlant, J., Kijko, A., Reynkens, T. & Einmahl, J. H. J. Estimating the maximum possible earthquake using extreme value methodology: The Groningen case. Nat. Hazards 98, 1091–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3162-2 (2019).
NAM B.V. Report on Mmax Expert Workshop 8–10 March 2016 World Trade Centre, Schiphol Airport, the Netherlands. NAM report (2016).
