Güneralp, B. et al. Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 8945–8950 (2017).
Miatto, A., Schandl, H., Fishman, T. & Tanikawa, H. Global patterns and trends for non-metallic minerals used for construction. J. Ind. Ecol. 21, 924–937 (2017).
UNEP. International resource panel: Global material flows database. https://www.resourcepanel.org/global-material-flows-database (2020).
USGS. National minerals information center. Mineral commodity summaries https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/index.html (2020).
Miller, S. A., Horvath, A. & Monteiro, P. J. M. Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 074029 (2016).
Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9793 (2018).
Monteiro, P. J. M., Miller, S. A. & Horvath, A. Towards sustainable concrete. Nat. Mater. 16, 698–699 (2017).
Miller, S. A. & Moore, F. C. Climate and health damages from global concrete production. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 439–443 (2020).
Miller, S. A., Horvath, A. & Monteiro, P. J. M. Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nat. Sustain. 1, 69–76 (2018).
Pamenter, S. & Myers, R. J. Decarbonizing the cementitious materials cycle: a whole-systems review of measures to decarbonize the cement supply chain in the UK and European contexts. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 359–376 (2021).
van Deventer, J. S. J., White, C. E. & Myers, R. J. A roadmap for production of cement and concrete with low-CO2 emissions. Waste Biomass. Valoriz. 12, 4745–4775 (2021).
Purnell, P. Material nature versus structural nurture: the embodied carbon of fundamental structural elements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 454–461 (2012).
Sathre, R. & O’Connor, J. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ. Sci. Policy 13, 104–114 (2010).
Churkina, G. et al. Buildings as a global carbon sink. Nat. Sustain. 3, 269–276 (2020).
GCCA. Getting the number right (GNR) project. https://gccassociation.org/gnr/ (2020).
Habert, G. & Ouellet-Plamondon, C. Recent update on the environmental impact of geopolymers. RILEM Tech. Lett. 1, 17 (2016).
Teh, S. H., Wiedmann, T., Castel, A. & de Burgh, J. Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia. J. Clean. Prod. 152, 312–320 (2017).
BSI. BS EN 197-1: Cement: Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements (2011).
Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S. & Maity, S. Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem. Concr. Res. 114, 49–56 (2018).
Miller, S. A. & Myers, R. J. Environmental impacts of alternative cement binders. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 677–686 (2020).
Nisbet, M., Vangeem, M. G., Gajda, J. & Marceau, M. Environmental life cycle inventory of Portland cement concrete. Portland Cement Association http://www.vangeemconsulting.com/73_Environmental_Life_Cycle_Inverntory_SN_2137.pdf (2007).
Huntzinger, D. N. & Eatmon, T. D. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 17, 668–675 (2009).
García-Segura, T., Yepes, V. & Alcalá, J. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of blended cement concrete including carbonation and durability. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 3–12 (2013).
Van Den Heede, P. & De Belie, N. Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations. Cem. Concr. Compos. 34, 431–442 (2012).
Seto, K. E., Churchill, C. J. & Panesar, D. K. Influence of fly ash allocation approaches on the life cycle assessment of cement-based materials. J. Clean. Prod. 157, 65–75 (2017).
Snellings, R., Mertens, G. & Elsen, J. Supplementary cementitious materials. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 74, 211–278 (2012).
Provis, J. L. & Bernal, S. A. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 299–327 (2014).
Hong, J., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Xu, C. & Xu, X. Life cycle assessment of caustic soda production: a case study in China. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 113–120 (2014).
Miller, S. A., Habert, G., Myers, R. J. & Harvey, J. T. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth 4, 1398–1411 (2021).
Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Pacca, S. A. & Horvath, A. Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050. Cem. Concr. Res. 114, 115–124 (2018).
USGS. Mineral commodity summaries: Cement. minerals.usgs.gov (2015).
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Getting the numbers right (GNR) project: Emission report 2016. https://docs.wbcsd.org/2016/12/GNR.pdf (2016).
Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M. & Gartner, E. M. Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 114, 2–26 (2018).
Shanks, W. et al. How much cement can we do without? Lessons from cement material flows in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, 441–454 (2019).
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Industry decarbonisation & energy efficiency roadmaps to 2050: Cement (2015).
Mineral Products Association (MPA). UK cement industry 2050 greenhouse gas strategy: Technical document. https://cement.mineralproducts.org/current_issues/climate_change/greenhouse_gas_reduction_strategy.php (2015).
Skocek, J., Zajac, M. & Ben Haha, M. Carbon capture and utilization by mineralization of cement pastes derived from recycled concrete. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).
Florea, M. V. A., Ning, Z. & Brouwers, H. J. H. Activation of liberated concrete fines and their application in mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 50, 1–12 (2014).
Provis, J. L. Alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 114, 40–48 (2018).
Pontikes, Y. & Angelopoulos, G. N. Bauxite residue in cement and cementitious applications: Current status and a possible way forward. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 73, 53–63 (2013).
Schmidt, W. et al. Sustainable circular value chains: From rural waste to feasible urban construction materials solutions. Dev. Built Environ. 6, 100047 (2021).
Climate Watch. Historical greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (excluding land use, land use-change and forestry). Climate Watch (2021).
Ritchie, H., Roser, M. & Rosado, P. Our World in Data. South Africa: CO2 Country Profile. https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/south-africa (2020).
Habert, G., D’Espinose De Lacaillerie, J. B. & Roussel, N. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1229–1238 (2011).
Alexander, M. & Beushausen, H. Durability, service life prediction, and modelling for reinforced concrete structures—review and critique. Cem. Concr. Res. 122, 17–29 (2019).
Peys, A. et al. Inorganic polymers From CaO-FeOx-SiO2 slag: the start of oxidation of Fe and the formation of a mixed valence binder. Front. Mater. 6, 212 (2019).
Sreenivasan, H. et al. Evidence of formation of an amorphous magnesium silicate (AMS) phase during alkali activation of (Na-Mg) aluminosilicate glasses. Cem. Concr. Res. 145, 106464 (2021).
ASTM. C1157/C1157M—20a: Standard performance specification for hydraulic cement (2020).
RILEM. Technical Committee 230: Performance-based specifications and control of concrete durability. https://www.rilem.net/groupe/230-psc-performance-based-specifications-and-control-of-concrete-durability-244 (2020).
ASTM. Document C1157 (Revision 00A): Standard performance specification for hydraulic cement. https://global.ihs.com/doc_detail.cfm?&csf=ECIA&input_search_filter=ICC&input_doc_number=&input_doc_title=&document_name=ASTM%20C1157&item_s_key=00210035&item_key_date=990421&origin=DSSC (2000).
Reis, D. C., Mack-Vergara, Y. & John, V. M. Material flow analysis and material use efficiency of Brazil’s mortar and concrete supply chain. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 1396–1409 (2019).
Infrastructure and Projects Authority. Government construction strategy 2016-20. (2016).
Laing O’Rourke. Explore Manufacturing. https://www.laingorourke.com/company/our-businesses/explore-manufacturing/ (2021).
Chowdhury, S., Mishra, M. & Suganya, O. The incorporation of wood waste ash as a partial cement replacement material for making structural grade concrete: An overview. Ain Shams Eng. J. 6, 429–437 (2015).
Worldsteel. Steel statistics. https://www.worldsteel.org/steel-by-topic/statistics.html (2021).
International Energy Agency. Data and statistics. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics (2020).
ACAA. Production and use reports. https://www.acaa-usa.org/publications/productionusereports.aspx (2020).
Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (2020).
Koopmans, A. & Koppejan, J. Regional consultation on modern applications of biomass energy. in Proceedings of the Regional Expert Consultation on Modern Applications of Biomass Energy (1997).
USEIA. Statistics on electric power plants, capacity, generation, fuel consumption, sales, prices and customers. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php (2020).
International Energy Agency. India 2020: Energy policy review. https://www.iea.org/reports/india-2020 (2020).
Yao, Z. T. et al. A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Sci. Rev. 141, 105–121 (2015).
Blissett, R. S. & Rowson, N. A. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel 97, 1–23 (2012).
Izquierdo, M. & Querol, X. Leaching behaviour of elements from coal combustion fly ash: an overview. Int. J. Coal Geol. 94, 54–66 (2012).
International Energy Agency. World coal consumption, 1971-2018. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/world-coal-consumption-1971-2018 (2020).
Poullikkas, A. Review of design, operating, and financial considerations in flue gas desulfurization systems. Energy Technol. Policy 2, 92–103 (2015).
USGS. Iron and steel slag end-use statistics. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/iron-and-steel-slag-statistics-and-information (2005).
Kero, I., Grådahl, S. & Tranell, G. Airborne emissions from Si/FeSi production. JOM 69, 365–380 (2017).
USGS. Minerals yearbook 2017: Silicon. https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/silica-2017-pdf (2020).
Mari Kirkebøen Næss. Mechanisms and kinetics of liquid silicon oxidation. (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2013).
USGS. National minerals information center. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/ (2020).
USGS. Bauxite and alumina statistics and information. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/bauxite-and-alumina-statistics-and-information?qt-science_support_page_related_con=0#qt-science_support_page_related_con (2021).
International Aluminium Institute. Alumina production statistics. https://international-aluminium.org/statistics/alumina-production/#data (2021).
Kuiper, L. & Oldenburger, J. The harvest of forest residues in Europe. https://www.probos.nl/biomassa-upstream/pdf/reportBUSD15a.pdf (2006).
Nilsson, B., Nilsson, D. & Thörnqvist, T. Distributions and losses of logging residues at clear-felled areas during extraction for bioenergy: comparing dried- and fresh-stacked method. Forests 6, 4212–4227 (2015).
Zając, G., Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J., Gołębiowski, W. & Szczepanik, M. Chemical characteristics of biomass ashes. Energies 11, 2885 (2018).
Cao, Z. et al. The sponge effect and carbon emission mitigation potentials of the global cement cycle. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
United Nations. World population prospects 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/ (2019).
Cao, Z., Shen, L., Løvik, A. N., Müller, D. B. & Liu, G. Elaborating the history of our cementing societies: An in-use stock perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 11468–11476 (2017).
USGS. Cement statistics and information. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/cement-statistics-and-information (2018).
Ban, C. C. & Ramli, M. Optimization of mix proportion of high performance mortar for structural applications. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 3, 643–649 (2010).
Khokhar, M. I. A., Roziere, E., Turcry, P., Grondin, F. & Loukili, A. Mix design of concrete with high content of mineral additions: Optimisation to improve early age strength. Cem. Concr. Compos. 32, 377–385 (2010).
Miller, S. A., Monteiro, P. J. M., Ostertag, C. P. & Horvath, A. Comparison indices for design and proportioning of concrete mixtures taking environmental impacts into account. Cem. Concr. Compos. 68, 131–143 (2016).
Provis, J. L. & van Deventer, J. S. J. Alkali activated materials. in RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports 13 (2014).
GCCA. Rice husk ash. https://gccassociation.org/cement-and-concrete-innovation/clinker-substitutes/rice-husk-ash/ (2022).
Ecofys. Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EUETS post 2012—Sector report for the cement industry (2009).
Gursel, A. P. Life-cycle assessment of concrete: decision-support tool and case study application (PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5q24d64s (2014).
Turk, J., Cotič, Z., Mladenovič, A. & Šajna, A. Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA. Waste Manag. 45, 194–205 (2015).
Myers, R. J., Bernal, S. A., Gehman, J. D., Van Deventer, J. S. J. & Provis, J. L. The role of al in cross-linking of alkali-activated slag cements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 996–1004 (2015).
Burhan, S., Srocka, M., Ciroth, A. & Recanati, F. Ecoinvent version 3.6 in openLCA (2019).
Huijbregts, M. A. J. et al. ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 138–147 (2016).
Stocker, T. F. et al. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324 (2014).
