Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
Freight

Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe

  • 1.

    ITF Transport Outlook 2019 (ITF, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1787/transp_outlook-en-2019-en

  • 2.

    Review of Maritime Transport 2019 (UNCTAD, 2019); https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf

  • 3.

    Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 (IMO, 2020); https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-ships.aspx

  • 4.

    Thomson, E. S. et al. Intensification of ice nucleation observed in ocean ship emissions. Sci. Rep. 8, 1111 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Capaldo, K., Corbett, J. J., Kasibhatla, P., Fischbeck, P. & Pandis, S. N. Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean. Nature 400, 743–746 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Liu, H. et al. Emissions and health impacts from global shipping embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1027–1033 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Sofiev, M. et al. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat. Commun. 9(dec), 406 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. in: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (2018); https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

  • 9.

    Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I. & Strømman, A. H. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transport. Res. D 52, 408–421 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Held, M. et al. Scrapping probabilities and committed CO2 emissions of the international ship fleet in 7th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management, and Economics (SNAM) (OnePetro, 2021); https://onepetro.org/SNAMESOME/proceedings/SOME21/2-SOME21/D021S003R001/461277

  • 12.

    Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (IMO, 2018); https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-ships.aspx

  • 13.

    European Commission, UMAS, CE Delft, Lloyd’s Register & Öko-Institut e.V. Study on Methods and Considerations for the Determination of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for International Shipping (European Commission, 2019); https://cedelft.eu/publications/study-on-methods-and-considerations-for-the-determination-of-greenhouse-gas-emission-reduction-targets-for-international-shipping/

  • 14.

    Balcombe, P. et al. How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Convers. Manag. 182, 72–88 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Detz, R. J., Reek, J. N. H. & van der Zwaan, B. C. C. The future of solar fuels: when could they become competitive? Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1653–1669 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Zhou, Y. J., Kerkhoven, E. J. & Nielsen, J. Barriers and opportunities in bio-based production of hydrocarbons. Nat. Energy 3, 925–935 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Babacan, O. et al. Assessing the feasibility of carbon dioxide mitigation options in terms of energy usage. Nat. Energy 5, 720–728 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Falter, C., Scharfenberg, N. & Habersetzer, A. Geographical potential of solar thermochemical jet fuel production. Energies 13, 802 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M. & Hansson, J. Electrofuels for the transport sector: a review of production costs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1887–1905 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Schemme, S., Samsun, R. C., Peters, R. & Stolten, D. Power-to-fuel as a key to sustainable transport systems—an analysis of diesel fuels produced from CO2 and renewable electricity. Fuel 205, 198–221 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Held, M. et al. On the energetic efficiency of producing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers from CO2 using electrical energy. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1019–1034 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Daioglou, V. et al. Greenhouse gas emission curves for advanced biofuel supply chains. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 920–924 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Decarbonising Maritime Transport: Pathways to Zero-Carbon Shipping by 2035 (ITF, 2018); https://www.itf-oecd.org/decarbonising-maritime-transport-2035

  • 24.

    Hansson, J., Månsson, S., Brynolf, S. & Grahn, M. Alternative marine fuels: prospects based on multi-criteria decision analysis involving Swedish stakeholders. Biomass Bioenergy 126, 159–173 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Gilbert, P. et al. Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 855–866 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Winebrake, J. J., Corbett, J. J., Umar, F. & Yuska, D. Pollution tradeoffs for conventional and natural gas-based marine fuels. Sustainability 11, 2235 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Energy Transition Outlook 2020: Maritime Forecast to 2050 (DNV, 2020); https://eto.dnv.com/2020/maritime

  • 28.

    Techno-economic Assessment of Zero-Carbon Fuels (Lloyd’s Register and UMAS, 2020); https://www.lr.org/en/insights/global-marine-trends-2030/techno-economic-assessment-of-zero-carbon-fuels/

  • 29.

    Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2020

  • 30.

    Comparison of Alternative Marine Fuels Report no. 2019-0567, Rev. 3; document no. 11C8I1KZ-1 (DNV GL, 2019).

  • 31.

    Van Hoecke, L. et al. Challenges in the use of hydrogen for maritime applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 815–843 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Prussi, M., Scarlat, N., Acciaro, M. & Kosmas, V. Potential and limiting factors in the use of alternative fuels in the European maritime sector. J. Clean. Prod. 291, 125849 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Korberg, A. D., Brynolf, S., Grahn, M. & Skov, I. R. Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 142, 110861 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Horvath, S., Fasihi, M. & Breyer, C. Techno-economic analysis of a decarbonized shipping sector: technology suggestions for a fleet in 2030 and 2040. Energy Convers. Manag. 164, 230–241 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Kim, K., Roh, G., Kim, W. & Chun, K. A preliminary study on an alternative ship propulsion system fueled by ammonia: environmental and economic assessments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 183 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Mao, X., Rutherford, D., Osipova, L. & Comer, B. Refueling Assessment of a Zero-Emission Container Corridor between China and the United States: Could Hydrogen Replace Fossil Fuels? (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2020); https://theicct.org/publications/zero-emission-container-corridor-hydrogen-2020

  • 37.

    Maritime Working Group Techno-economic Assessment of Low-Carbon Hydrogen Technologies for the Decarbonization of Shipping (Hydrogen Europe and Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH (LBST), in the press).

  • 38.

    Brethomé, F. M., Williams, N. J., Seipp, C. A., Kidder, M. K. & Custelcean, R. Direct air capture of CO2 via aqueous-phase absorption and crystalline-phase release using concentrated solar power. Nat. Energy 3, 553–559 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Armstrong, R. C. et al. The frontiers of energy. Nat. Energy 1, 15020 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 267–278 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Net Zero by 2050—A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050

  • 42.

    Roh, M.-I. & Lee, K.-Y. Computational Ship Design (Springer, 2018).

  • 43.

    CO2 Emission Report (EMSA/THETIS-MRV, 2021; accessed 15 May 2020); https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/#public/emission-report

  • 44.

    Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of 29 April 2015 on the Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Maritime Transport, and Amending Directive 2009/16/EC European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2015).

  • 45.

    McGill, R., Remley, W. & Winther, K. Alternative Fuels for Marine Applications (IEA, 2013); https://www.iea-amf.org/app/webroot/files/file/AnnexReports/AMF_Annex_41.pdf

  • 46.

    Setting the Course to Low Carbon Shipping: View of the Value Chain (American Bureau of Shipping, 2021); https://absinfo.eagle.org/acton/attachment/16130/f-c04f4eaf-a121-4560-9e15-5a56ee443f32/1/-/-/-/-/sustainability-outlook-iii-21055-web.pdf?utm_source=cision

  • 47.

    Vestering, C. Which tanker fuels are best for profits and the environment? Maritime Impact (17 March 2021); https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Which-tanker-fuels-are-best-for-profits-and-the-environment.html

  • 48.

    FleetMon. AIS and ship specification data from FleetMon.com, JAKOTA Cruise Systems GmbH, data provided on Dec 17, 2019 and Oct 19, 2020, Rostock, Germany, 2020; https://www.fleetmon.com/

  • 49.

    Hjelle, H. M. The double load factor problem of Ro-Ro shipping. Marit. Policy Manag. 38, 235–249 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Jia, H., Prakash, V. & Smith, T. Estimating vessel payloads in bulk shipping using AIS data. Int. J. Shipping Transp. Logist. 11, 25–40 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Jalkanen, J.-P. et al. Extension of an assessment model of ship traffic exhaust emissions for particulate matter and carbon monoxide. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 2641–2659 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Krantz, R., Søgaard, K. & Smith, T. Getting to Zero-Coalition: The scale of Investment Needed to Decarbonize International Shipping (UMAS and Energy Transitions Commission, 2020); www.globalmaritimeforum.org/content/2020/01/Getting-to-Zero-Coalition_Insight-brief_Scale-of-investment.pdf

  • 53.

    Supply, Transformation and Consumption of Electricity: Electricity Available for Final Consumption (Eurostat, 2020); https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nrg_cb_e&lang=en

  • 54.

    Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions: ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality (European Commission, 2021); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/

  • 55.

    Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Use of Renewable and Low-Carbon Fuels in Maritime Transport and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (European Commission, 2021); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/fueleu_maritime_-_green_european_maritime_space.pdf

  • 56.

    Johansson, L., Jalkanen, J.-P., Kalli, J. & Kukkonen, J. The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 11375–11389 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L. & Kukkonen, J. A comprehensive inventory of the ship traffic exhaust emissions in the Baltic Sea from 2006 to 2009. AMBIO 43, 311–324 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    World Port Index 27th edn, Pub 150 (US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2019); https://msi.nga.mil/Publications/WPI

  • 59.

    Moreno-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Comparative analysis between different methods for calculating on-board ship’s emissions and energy consumption based on operational data. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 575–584 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Goldsworthy, B. & Goldsworthy, L. Assigning machinery power values for estimating ship exhaust emissions: comparison of auxiliary power schemes. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 963–977 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    van Biert, L., Godjevac, M., Visser, K. & Aravind, P. V. A review of fuel cell systems for maritime applications. J. Power Sources 327, 345–364 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Schimpe, M. et al. Energy efficiency evaluation of a stationary lithium-ion battery container storage system via electro-thermal modeling and detailed component analysis. Appl. Energy 210, 211–229 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    César, P. P. et al. Evaluation of the CO2 emissions reduction potential of Li-ion batteries in ship power systems. Energies 12, 375 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Mongird, K. et al. Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report (US Department of Energy, 2019); https://doi.org/10.2172/1573487

  • 65.

    Beuse, M., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. Projecting the competition between energy-storage technologies in the electricity sector. Joule 4, 2162–2184 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Energy Storage: Tracking the Technologies that will Transform the Power Sector (Deloitte & Touche LLP, 2015); https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/no/Documents/energy-resources/energy-storage-tracking-technologies-transform-power-sector.pdf

  • 67.

    Bielmann, M., Vogt, U. F., Zimmermann, M. & Züttel, A. Seasonal energy storage system based on hydrogen for self sufficient living. J. Power Sources 196, 4054–4060 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Mestemaker, B. T. W, Gonçalves Castro, M. B., van der Blom, E. C., Cornege, H. J. & Visser, K. Zero emission vessels from a shipbuilders perspective. In 2nd International Conference on Smart & Green Technology for the Future of Marine Industries (SMATECH 2019) 52–61 (ASRANet, 2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334480164_Zero_emission_vessels_from_a_shipbuilders_perspective

  • 69.

    Taccani, R., Malabotti, S., Dall’Armi, C. & Micheli, D. High energy density storage of gaseous marine fuels: an innovative concept and its application to a hydrogen powered ferry. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 67, 33–56 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Nuchturee, C., Li, T. & Xia, H. Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 134, 110145 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Klell, M. in Handbook of Hydrogen Storage (ed. Hirscher, M.) 1–37 (Wiley, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527629800.ch1

  • 72.

    Battery Requirements for Future Automotive Applications (EUCAR, 2019); https://www.eucar.be/battery-requirements-for-future-automotive-applications/

  • 73.

    Bloch, C., Newcomb, J., Shiledar, S. & Tyson, M. Breakthrough Batteries: Powering the Era of Clean Electrification (RMI, 2020); http://www.rmi.org/breakthrough-batteries

  • 74.

    Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S. & Winter, M. Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density. J. Solid State Electrochem. 21, 1939–1964 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 75.

    Ue, M., Sakaushi, K. & Uosaki, K. Basic knowledge in battery research bridging the gap between academia and industry. Mater. Horiz. 7, 1937–1954 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Quinn, J. B., Waldmann, T., Richter, K., Kasper, M. & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. Energy density of cylindrical Li-ion cells: a comparison of commercial 18650 to the 21700 cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3284–A3291 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Liener, P. VW-backed battery maker QuantumScape to go public at $3.3 billion valuation. Reuters Business News 15 September 2020); https://www.reuters.com/article/us-quantumscape-m-a-kensington/vw-backed-u-s-battery-maker-quantumscape-to-go-public-at-3-3-billion-valuation-idUSKBN25U1JH

  • 78.

    Prussi, M., Yugo, M., De Prada, L., Padella, M. & Edwards, R. JEC Well-To-Wheels Report v5 EUR 30284 EN (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020); https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/jec-well-wheels-report-v5

  • 79.

    Das, L. On-board hydrogen storage systems for automotive application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 21, 789–800 (1996).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 80.

    Lindstad, E. Alternative fuels versus traditional fuels in shipping. In 6th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics (SNAME) 2018 (OnePetro, 2018. URL https://onepetro.org/SNAMESOME/proceedings-abstract/SOME18/All-SOME18/SNAME-SOME-2018-014/21299

  • 81.

    Mendez, A., Leo, T. & Herreros, M. Current state of technology of fuel cell power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. Energies 7, 4676–4693 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    Ustolin, F., Paltrinieri, N. & Berto, F. Loss of integrity of hydrogen technologies: a critical review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 23809–23840 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    Rivard, E., Trudeau, M. & Zaghib, K. Hydrogen storage for mobility: a review. Materials 12, 1973 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Kircher, O., Greim, G. & Brunner, T. Validation of cryo-compressed hydrogen storage (CCH2)—a probabilistic approach. In International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (HyodrogenTools, 2011); http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2011/papers/258.pdf

  • 85.

    Züttel, A., Remhof, A., Borgschulte, A. & Friedrichs, O. Hydrogen: the future energy carrier. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 3329–3342 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Takeichi, N. ‘Hybrid hydrogen storage vessel’, a novel high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel combined with hydrogen storage material. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1121–1129 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 87.

    Nazir, H. et al. Is the H2 economy realizable in the foreseeable future? Part II: H2 storage, transportation, and distribution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 20693–20708 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Hua, T. Q. et al. Technical assessment of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 3037–3049 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    MARIN Sustainable Power (European Sustainable Shipping Forum, 2020; accessed 10 February 2020); https://sustainablepower.application.marin.nl/table

  • 90.

    Norwegian Future Value Chains for Liquid Hydrogen (NCE Maritime CleanTech, 2016); https://maritimecleantech.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Report-liquid-hydrogen.pdf

  • 91.

    Liu, X., Elgowainy, A. & Wang, M. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ammonia production from renewable resources and industrial by-products. Green Chem. 22, 5751–5761 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 92.

    Beuttler, C., Charles, L. & Wurzbacher, J. The role of direct air capture in mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Front. Clim. 1, 10 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 93.

    Lee, S. G., Choi, G. B. & Lee, J. M. Optimal design and operating conditions of the CO2 liquefaction process, considering variations in cooling water temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54, 12855–12866 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 94.

    Pospíšil, J. Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 99, 1–15 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 95.

    Assessment of Selected Alternative Fuels and Technologies (DNV GL, 2018); https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/publications/alternative-fuel-assessment-download.html

  • 96.

    Van-Dal, É. S. & Bouallou, C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J. Clean. Prod. 57, 38–45 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 97.

    Ammonia: Zero-Carbon Fertiliser, Fuel and Energy Store (The Royal Society, 2020); https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/low-carbon-energy-programme/green-ammonia/

  • 98.

    Geertsma, R. & Krijgsman, M. Alternative Fuels and Power Systems to Reduce Environmental Impact of Support Vessels (Delft University of Technology, 2019); https://doi.org/10.24868/issn.2515-8198.2019.003

  • 99.

    Pavlenko, N., Comer, B., Zhou, Y., Clark, N. & Rutherford, D. The Climate Implications of Using LNG as a Marine Fuel Working Paper 2020-02 (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2020); https://theicct.org/publications/climate-impacts-LNG-marine-fuel-2020

  • 100.

    Kofod, M. & Mundt, T. Well-to-wake greenhouse gas emissions from LNG in marine applications. MTZ Ind. 5, 62–71 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 101.

    Tronstad, T., Åstrand, H., Haugom, G. P. & Langfeldt, L. Study on the Use of Fuel Cells in Shipping (European Maritime Safety Agency, 2017); http://www.emsa.europa.eu/newsroom/latest-news/download/4545/2921/23.html

  • 102.

    Baldi, F., Moret, S., Tammi, K. & Maréchal, F. The role of solid oxide fuel cells in future ship energy systems. Energy 194, 116811 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 103.

    Comer, B. Transitioning Away from Heavy Fuel Oil in Arctic Shipping (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019); https://theicct.org/publications/transitioning-away-heavy-fuel-oil-arctic-shipping

  • 104.

    Schjølberg, I., Hulteberg, C., Yasuda, I. & Nelsson, C. Small scale reformers for on-site hydrogen supply. Energy Procedia 29, 559–566 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 105.

    Krewitt, W. & Schmid, S. CASCADE Mints: WP 1.5 Common Information Database D 1.1 Fuel Cell Technologies and Hydrogen Production/Distribution Options — German Aerospace Center (DLR, 2005);https://www.dlr.de/fk/Portaldata/40/Resources/dokumente/publikationen/2005-09-02_CASCADE_D1.1_fin.pdf

  • 106.

    H21 North of England Report (H21 North of England, 2018); https://h21.green/projects/h21-north-of-england/

  • 107.

    Marbán, G. & Valdés-Solís, T. Towards the hydrogen economy? Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 1625–1637 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 108.

    Kim, T. in Micro Electronic and Mechanical Systems (ed. Takahata, K.) Ch. 3 (InTech, 2009).

  • 109.

    Lipman, T. & Shah, N. Ammonia as an Alternative Energy Storage Medium for Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Scientific and Technical Review for Near-Term Stationary Power Demonstration Projects (Univ. California, 2007); https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z69v4wp

  • 110.

    Li, K. & Tseng, K. J. Energy efficiency of lithium-ion battery used as energy storage devices in micro-grid. In 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 5235–5240 (IEEE, 2015); https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2015.7392923http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7392923/

  • 111.

    Giddey, S., Badwal, S. P. S., Munnings, C. & Dolan, M. Ammonia as a renewable energy transportation media. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 10231–10239 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Related posts

    Edited Transcript of KNIN.S earnings conference call or presentation 27-Feb-20 1:00pm GMT

    scceu

    Express Delivery Market Size in Brazil to Grow by USD 1.70 Bn | Technavio

    scceu

    WiseTech, C.H. Robinson, Descartes, Werner Enterprises, Mercurygate – SG Research Sphere

    scceu