Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
Procurement

Senate Passes Chips-Plus Package, House Passage Imminent – Government Contracts, Procurement & PPP


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a bipartisan vote of 64-33, the Senate passed legislation
earlier today to fund domestic semiconductor manufacturing and
boost federal scientific research and development. The bill was
supported by 17 Republicans and opposed by just one Democrat.

The package’s successful passage marks a dramatic reversal
of fortunes for the legislation. Just a few weeks ago, it appeared
that the product of the conference committee’s work to resolve
differences between the Senate-passed U.S. Innovation and
Competition Act (USICA)(S. 1260) and the House-passed America Creating
Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology,
Education and Science (COMPETES Act)(H.R. 4521) might be abandoned altogether in
favor of the Democrats’ effort to enact other domestic
priorities by a simple majority vote through a process known as
reconciliation. However, when the ambitions of that package were
significantly curtailed, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer
(D-NY) moved forward with a semiconductor manufacturing bill
focused solely on those incentives and not the various other titles
under negotiation by the conference committee. A group of Senators
led by Todd Young (R-IN) rallied bipartisan support for the
addition of a title dedicated to increasing and re-prioritizing
federal scientific research and development, which led to its
inclusion in the final package now known as
“Chips-Plus”.

The House is expected to take up the legislation later this week
and pass it before adjourning for the August recess. Speaker Nancy
Pelosi (D-CA) has expressed confidence that there are enough
votes across both parties for passage, especially after several senior House Republicans issued statements publicly backing
the bill last week. While a newly revived reconciliation deal could
undermine House Republican support for the Chips-Plus package,
final passage is still expected.

Despite the broad scope that the “Chips-Plus” name
implies, the bill still leaves out many provisions that were under
negotiation by the conference committee. This client alert provides
an overview of what made it into the final bill, how it may differ
from the earlier versions and what got left behind.

What’s in It?

Technically, the Chips-Plus package is three acts combined into
one larger bill: Division A is the “CHIPS Act of 2022”;
Division B is the “Research and Development, Competition and
Innovation Act”; and Division C is the “Supreme Court
Security Funding Act of 2022”. This alert reviews Divisions A
and B.

The Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for
America Act (CHIPS Act) of 2022 appropriates over $52 billion over
five years in incentives to develop semiconductor manufacturing
capacity in the United States. The funding will be distributed
through several programs that were authorized in last year’s
CHIPS for America Act:

  • DOC Manufacturing Incentives – The bill
    includes $39 billion in financial assistance for building,
    expanding or modernizing domestic semiconductor facilities and
    equipment for fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced packaging,
    research and development, including $2 billion specifically for
    mature semiconductors. Within the incentive program, up to $6
    billion may be used for the cost of direct loans and loan
    guarantees. This program will be administered by the Department of
    Commerce. The total amount and annual appropriations detailed in
    the final Chips-Plus package for semiconductor manufacturing
    incentives are the same as originally included in both the COMPETES
    Act and USICA. However, the final package adopts eligibility
    changes for these incentives that allow upstream producers of
    semiconductor manufacturing equipment and materials to be eligible
    for this funding in addition to the direct manufacturers. This
    change was not included in USICA.

  • Guardrails and Oversight – Division A
    also includes a new set of guardrails to ensure that entities that
    receive the semiconductor incentive funding do not use the funding
    to buy back their own stock, provide shareholders with dividend
    payments or expand advanced semiconductor manufacturing
    capabilities in foreign countries of concern like China. The DOC
    will also be required to ensure that the funding is used to advance
    opportunity and inclusion activities, a provision called for by Sens. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and
    Alex Padilla (D-CA) in March 2022. These guardrail and oversight
    provisions were not included in either the America COMPETES Act or
    USICA.

  • DOC Research and Development – The bill
    includes $11 billion for various research and development efforts
    to support the semiconductor ecosystem, including the National
    Semiconductor Technology Center, the National Advance Packaging
    Manufacturing Program, the Manufacturing USA Semiconductor
    Institute and the Microelectronics Metrology Research and
    Development Program. This funding will also be administered by the
    Department of Commerce (DOC). This level of funding is roughly the
    same as included in the original America COMPETES Act and USICA;
    however, it is $200 million lower than originally appropriated,
    which appears to have been reallocated to a separate workforce and
    education fund.

  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund
    – The bill appropriates $200 million for the National Science
    Foundation (NSF) to meet the workforce goals of the CHIPS for
    America Act. This specific fund was included in neither the America
    COMPETES Act nor USICA.

  • CHIPS for America Defense Fund – As
    included in both bills under consideration by the bipartisan
    competition and innovation conference committee, the legislation
    includes $2 billion in appropriations for the CHIPS for America
    Defense Fund so that the Defense Department may carry out the
    research, development, test and evaluation, workforce development
    and other requirements unique to the intelligence community.

  • CHIPS for America International Technology Security and
    Innovation Fund
    – To be administered by the
    Department of State—in consultation with the U.S. Agency for
    International Development, the Export-Import Bank and the U.S.
    International Development Finance Corporation—the package
    includes $500 million to provide for international information and
    communications technology security and semiconductor supply
    chains.

  • Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund
    – The bill includes $1.5 billion in direct appropriations to
    be managed by the National Telecommunications and Information
    Administration for the expansion of open radio access networks,
    commonly referred to as ORAN. While the House’s America
    COMPETES Act required construction projects supported by this fund
    to pay prevailing wages, this requirement was stripped out before
    its final passage in that chamber and is not included in the final
    package.

  • Advanced Manufacturing Investment Tax Credit
    – Based on the Facilitating American-Built Semiconductors
    (FABS) Act introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rep. Michael
    McCaul (R-TX), the package also includes a 25 percent investment
    tax credit for semiconductor manufacturing facilities expenditures.
    Only properties opened and operational after December 31, 2022, and
    for which construction is started prior to January 1, 2027, are
    eligible for this opportunity. The investment tax credit also
    includes a “guardrail” provision that would lead the
    recipient to forfeit the credit if that recipient engages in a
    significant transaction involving the material expansion of
    semiconductor manufacturing capacity of the recipient in China or
    another foreign country of concern. Neither the America COMPETES
    Act nor USICA included the FABS Act tax credit for semiconductor
    manufacturing or design, which the Congressional Budget Office
    expects to cost over $24 billion.

While the Research and Development, Competition and Innovation
Act found in Division B of the package is rooted in the science
titles of the America COMPETES Act and USICA, those bills had two
different approaches to boosting and re-prioritizing federal
support for scientific research and development. The final package
takes from both approaches and ultimately authorizes over $100
billion in funding for science funding at the NSF, National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and DOC, which is $52
billion above the baseline of authorized funding. Division B
represents nearly 900 of the bill’s over 1,000 pages, and below
is an overview of only several of the most prominent sections.

  • NSF Directorate – The Act establishes an
    NSF Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships, whose
    mission is “to advance research and development, technology
    deployment, and related solutions to address United States
    societal, national, and geostrategic challenges, for the benefit
    all Americans.” The bill authorizes $20 billion over five
    years for the new Directorate. The directorate would be directed to
    focus on key technologies, including artificial intelligence,
    quantum, and synthetic biology, among others. An earlier iteration
    of this idea was initially included in the Endless Frontier Act, a
    bill first introduced last Congress by Sens. Todd Young (R-IN) and
    Schumer and which served as the bipartisan engine for the overhaul
    and dramatic increase in funding federal scientific research and
    development. However, the Directorate was not in the America
    COMPETES Act. Therefore, the Directorate in the final package more
    closely resembles the provisions of USICA than COMPETES.

  • Regional Tech Hubs – $10 billion is
    authorized for the development of at least 20 regional technology
    and innovation hub programs to support domestic leadership in
    sectors critical to national and economic security, to promote
    regional economic development and resilience, especially within
    rural and underserved communities, to expand advanced domestic
    manufacturing, and to address the intersection of emerging
    technologies and either regional or national challenges. Of the 20
    hubs established, one-third must significantly benefit small and
    rural communities, and one third must benefit states or territories
    benefiting from the Established Program to Stimulate Competitive
    Research (ESPCoR) of the NSF. Notably, the final package is closer
    to the details of the program laid out in USICA, which also
    authorized $10 billion for the hubs and required at least 20 such
    hubs, while the America COMPETES Act was less generous and required
    fewer hubs.

  • Department of Energy – The House
    Committee on Science led on the development of the Department of
    the Energy Science for the Future Act, which its leaders first
    introduced in May of 2021 and passed the full House on a bipartisan
    basis a month later. Its provisions were largely adopted in the
    America COMPETES Act, but had no counterpart in the Senate-passed
    USICA. As a result, the final title closely resembles the text
    included in the COMPETES Act, which will authorize new and existing
    research initiatives relating to basic energy science, biological
    and environmental research, advance scientific computing research,
    fusion energy research, high energy physics and nuclear
    physics.

What’s Out?

Despite the significant amount of spending and new programs that
are included in the package, there is arguably even more that was
left out since the America COMPETES Act and USICA were each the
product of work done by many committees in both chambers.

  • Trade Title – Arguably the most
    contentious of all the titles being reviewed by the conference
    committee, the entire trade title was left out of the final
    Chips-Plus package. As a result, the currently expired Trade
    Adjustment Assistance, Miscellaneous Tariff Bill and Generalized
    System of Preferences programs will have to wait for another
    legislative opportunity to be revived. In addition, products from
    China that are subject to additional tariffs under Section 301 that
    previously benefited from an expired tariff exclusion will continue
    to face additional tariffs. Further, new proposals to remove de
    minimis tariff treatment for goods coming from certain countries
    and screen outbound investments will not become law as part of this
    proposal.

  • Consumer Protection – Several bills that
    sought to crack down on the sale of counterfeit goods online
    included in the America COMPETES Act and USICA also fell out of the
    final package:

    • INFORM Consumers Act: Though the INFORM
      Consumers Act gained bipartisan support as a standalone bill, its
      text was only included in the America COMPETES Act. If passed, it
      would require certain online platforms to verify their high-volume
      third-party sellers and suspend those sellers from activity on the
      platform if they fail to comply with the disclosure requirements in
      the bill. Penalties for the platforms that fail to comply are
      severe and include enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission
      (FTC) and state attorneys general.

    • SHOP SAFE Act: The America COMPETES Act also
      included language pulled from the SHOP SAFE Act which would make
      e-commerce platforms with annual sales of $500,000 or more, or
      those that received 10 notices identifying counterfeit goods that
      implicate health and safety, liable for infringement of a
      registered trademark by a third-party seller of goods if the seller
      uses a counterfeit mark in connection with selling or advertising
      goods on the platform. Like the INFORM Consumers Act, its language
      was not included in the Senate-passed USICA.

    • Country of Origin Labeling Online Act:
      Introduced in the 116th Congress, USICA included the key provisions
      of the Country of Origin Labeling Online Act. This bill would
      require country-of-origin labeling for a product to be clearly and
      conspicuously stated in the website’s description of the
      product and clear disclosure of the country in which the seller of
      the product is located (and, if applicable, the country in which
      any parent corporation of such seller is located) in the online
      product listing.


  • Supply Chain Resiliency Program
    Despite variations included in both the America COMPETES Act and
    USICA, a federal supply chain resiliency program was not included
    in the “Chips-Plus” proposal. Language in the America
    COMPETES Act would have established an Office of Supply Chain
    Resiliency and Crisis Response at the Department of Commerce to
    promote U.S. leadership in critical industries and authorized a $45
    billion fund for grants, loans and loan guarantees to support
    on-shoring or near-shoring of critical industries. While USICA did
    not authorize an on-shoring or near-shoring fund, it did establish
    a program to map critical supply chains and identify gaps in those
    supply chains. Ultimately, neither the $45 billion fund included in
    the America COMPETES Act nor the narrower program included in USICA
    were adopted in the final Chips-Plus package.

The above summary outlines the key components of the Chips-Plus
package. The full text of the legislation can be viewed here.

Akin Gump will host a webinar on Wednesday, August 3 at 12:00
p.m. ET to discuss the Chips-Plus legislation. Invitation to
follow.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Government, Public Sector from United States

God Bless The U.S.A.

Crowe & Dunlevy

The United States Supreme Court last week issued important rulings affecting religious freedom. The two cases are Carson v Makin and Kennedy v Bremerton. Both cases involve the First Amendment and schools.

Related posts

Comms announce hiring for top public safety post | News, Sports, Jobs

scceu

Red Oak council discusses city procurement policy | News

scceu

Restaurant POS Software Market Trends, Size, Demand, Status, Analysis And Forecast To 2027 – Atlantic Financial Management

scceu