Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
Procurement

No Shame In The Pay Reporting Game: Pay Transparency Senate Bill 1162 Abandons Public Disclosure Requirement – Government Contracts, Procurement & PPP


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Seyfarth Synopsis: SB 1162, which may soon
be signed into law, will require employers to report even more pay
data to the California Civil Rights Department (f/k/a the
Department of Fair Employment and Housing until July 1, 2022),
including median and mean pay gap information. A key contested
provision that would have required the Civil Rights Department to
post the pay data online, however, was recently removed from the
bill.

SB 1162’s mission: require more pay data disclosures from
employers. Accomplished? Almost. California’s most recent pay
transparency bill looks likely to become law before September 30th.
With it, employers will be required to comply with a host of new
pay data disclosure requirements.

One requirement initially included in the bill, however, did not
survive the legislative process. While SB 1162 proposed that the
Civil Rights Department publish employers’ pay data on a public
website, a recent amendment removed that requirement. So what
happens to the granular pay data that employers will report to the
Civil Rights Department? Only the Civil Rights Department will have
access to that information.

Reporting Changes

Proponents of SB 1162 believe that the current law does not do enough to ferret out
pay inequities, and, through SB 1162, seek to impose the following
changes:

  • Revise the deadline to submit pay data reports, with the new
    deadline occurring annually on the second Wednesday of May each
    year.

  • Within each job category, SB 1162 would require that employers
    report the median and mean hourly rate by each combination of race,
    ethnicity, and sex. (Existing law, by comparison, requires only
    numerical counts of employees by race, ethnicity and sex within
    each job category and pay band).

  • Employers that have 100 or more employees hired through labor
    contractors would have a new obligation to produce data on pay,
    hours worked, race/ethnicity and gender information in a separate
    report. The most recent amendment to the bill requires that labor
    contractors “supply all necessary pay data to the private
    employer,” but does not contain a separate mandate for the
    labor contractors to collect the “necessary pay data,”
    nor does it define the data required or address issues with regard
    to timing of such disclosures. The bill also attempts to hold labor
    contractors responsible by allowing a court to apportion an
    “appropriate amount” of any penalties to any labor
    contractor who failed to provide required pay data to the employer.
    This will be difficult to implement in practice because employers
    rarely have access to labor contractors’ pay and demographic
    data. The Department also requires that employers certify the
    accuracy of pay data reports, which would be practically impossible
    to do with respect to labor contractors’ data.

  • Employers with more than 15 employees would be required to
    include a pay scale in all job postings (and to provide that
    information to third parties who post those jobs). New amendments
    to the bill would clarify that no penalty would apply for a first
    violation of this requirement if the employer can show that all job
    postings for open positions have been updated to include the pay
    scale.

  • All employers, regardless of size, would be required to provide
    a pay scale for a current employee’s position at the
    employee’s request—in addition to the requirement in
    existing law to provide candidates for employment the pay scale for
    the position the candidate is seeking.

  • Employers with multiple establishments would no longer be
    required to submit a consolidated report; rather, employers would
    continue to be required to submit a report for each
    establishment.

No Publication Requirement

Initially, SB 1162 directed that the Department publish each
employer’s submitted pay reports. The employer community
objected to this requirement and Seyfarth Shaw provided testimony
on this issue on behalf of Cal Chamber.

Shortly thereafter, on August 15, 2022, an amendment removed the
public disclosure provision. If passed in its current form, the
Department would only be allowed to publish “aggregate”
reports that do not associate the pay data with individual
employers.

Looking Ahead

The final California Assembly vote will take place the week of
August 29, 2022, and if the bill passes, it will return to the
Senate for concurrence on the amendments and approval to move to
Governor Newsom’s desk — all of which must happen by August
31. The Governor has until September 30 to approve or veto the
bill. If he approves it, the pay scale disclosure requirements
would be effective beginning January 1, 2023. The updated pay data
reports, including mean and median pay gap information, would be
due starting May 10, 2023.

Workplace Solutions

Employers should begin to plan compliance now, including
compiling and reviewing data to identify areas needing
attention.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Government, Public Sector from United States

Government Contracts Legal Round-Up | 2022 Issue 16

Jenner & Block

Welcome to Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts Legal Round-Up, a biweekly update on important government contracts developments. This update offers brief summaries of key developments…

Related posts

Asher Lipman – The Independent

scceu

Procurement Minister still expects 1.3 million vaccines from Moderna by end of March

scceu

Covid-19 impact on Rubber-based Hot-melt Tape Market Growth Outlook, Key Procurement Criteria and Geographical Analysis – 3w Market News Reports

scceu