Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org
News

Decision-making under uncertainty – Supply Chain Management Review




By ·

Seems like everything these days is COVID-19. Recently the editor of the Journal of Business Forecasting asked me to write an article on demand planning under uncertainty.* Initially it sounded redundant. I asked: “Doesn’t all demand planning (as well as demand forecasting) always deal with uncertainty? After all, customers are fickle.”

Moreover, I have been teaching introductory business analytics in which I cover decision-making under risk vis-a-vis uncertainty. So, did the editor also mean risk in addition to or separate from uncertainty? This Insights column is a slightly revised version of the article I wrote clarifying the terms risk versus uncertainty. It focuses mainly on the latter because most formal decision-making—dealing with “apparent” randomness—is statistically- and probability-based.

A textbook view of uncertainty and risk

I teach a quantitative undergraduate business-school class each semester at the University of Massachusetts in Lowell. The course I have been teaching of late is called “Introduction to Business Analytics,” a required course for undergraduate business majors. The course textbook is “Quantitative Analysis for Management” by Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, Jr., and Michael E. Hanna. Chapter three deals with decision analysis and talks about three types of decision-making environments.

  1. Decision making under certainty. “A decision-making environment in which future outcomes or states of nature are known.” This one may seem like demand-Nirvana to forecasters and supply-chain (SC) planners. However, it is not, for two reasons. The first is that if everything is known, resulting in 100% demand forecasting and planning accuracy, we would find our skills surplus to requirements. The second is that if demand is known, it might be so because the marketing and sales functions are not promoting nor developing significant new products; or their promotions are just plain ineffectual. Regarding the second point, more than likely their company’s future is not bright, and might indeed eventually die due to successful competitive threats.
  2. Decision making under uncertainty. “A decision-making environment in which several outcomes or states of nature may occur. The probabilities of these outcomes, however, are not known.” Knowing what might happen in these environments may sound comforting to a planner, but not too much. Just knowing that a known set of pandemics or earthquakes will occur doesn’t help us predict when they will happen, nor can we predict their severity. A new product launch that just resembles other product launches is only slightly more comforting. Moreover, comparing COVID-19 to arguably the closest thing to it, the flu, hasn’t helped the world successfully manage the outbreak.
  3. Decision making under risk. “A decision-making environment in which several outcomes or states of nature may occur as a result of a decision or alternative. The probabilities of the outcomes or states of nature are known.” Most demand forecasting and supply chain planning practices are meant for these types of environments. Because historical data is available, statistical methods can be used to estimate various probabilities of the states of nature and statistical-based inventory management practices (for example) are well known, for example, for setting safety-stock levels.

By ·

Seems like everything these days is COVID-19. Recently the editor of the Journal of Business Forecasting asked me to write an article on demand planning under uncertainty.* Initially it sounded redundant. I asked: “Doesn’t all demand planning (as well as demand forecasting) always deal with uncertainty? After all, customers are fickle.”

Moreover, I have been teaching introductory business analytics in which I cover decision-making under risk vis-a-vis uncertainty. So, did the editor also mean risk in addition to or separate from uncertainty? This Insights column is a slightly revised version of the article I wrote clarifying the terms risk versus uncertainty. It focuses mainly on the latter because most formal decision-making—dealing with “apparent” randomness—is statistically- and probability-based.

A textbook view of uncertainty and risk

I teach a quantitative undergraduate business-school class each semester at the University of Massachusetts in Lowell. The course I have been teaching of late is called “Introduction to Business Analytics,” a required course for undergraduate business majors. The course textbook is “Quantitative Analysis for Management” by Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, Jr., and Michael E. Hanna. Chapter three deals with decision analysis and talks about three types of decision-making environments.

  1. Decision making under certainty. “A decision-making environment in which future outcomes or states of nature are known.” This one may seem like demand-Nirvana to forecasters and supply-chain (SC) planners. However, it is not, for two reasons. The first is that if everything is known, resulting in 100% demand forecasting and planning accuracy, we would find our skills surplus to requirements. The second is that if demand is known, it might be so because the marketing and sales functions are not promoting nor developing significant new products; or their promotions are just plain ineffectual. Regarding the second point, more than likely their company’s future is not bright, and might indeed eventually die due to successful competitive threats.
  2. Decision making under uncertainty. “A decision-making environment in which several outcomes or states of nature may occur. The probabilities of these outcomes, however, are not known.” Knowing what might happen in these environments may sound comforting to a planner, but not too much. Just knowing that a known set of pandemics or earthquakes will occur doesn’t help us predict when they will happen, nor can we predict their severity. A new product launch that just resembles other product launches is only slightly more comforting. Moreover, comparing COVID-19 to arguably the closest thing to it, the flu, hasn’t helped the world successfully manage the outbreak.
  3. Decision making under risk. “A decision-making environment in which several outcomes or states of nature may occur as a result of a decision or alternative. The probabilities of the outcomes or states of nature are known.” Most demand forecasting and supply chain planning practices are meant for these types of environments. Because historical data is available, statistical methods can be used to estimate various probabilities of the states of nature and statistical-based inventory management practices (for example) are well known, for example, for setting safety-stock levels.

 

 








Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!

Subscribe today. Don’t Miss Out!
Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!


Related posts

Transformational Approach To Defining And Solving Agri-Food Supply Chain Problems Launched By SWARM Engineering

scceu

Thieves looting LA trains like the wild west expose the supply chain's 'weakest link' – USA TODAY

scceu

Digitisation of supply chain to ensure smooth manufacturing in the ‘new normal’

scceu