To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Federal and state laws relating to supply chain due
diligence include:
- A 2010 Wall Street reform and consumer protection law requires
SEC-listed companies to disclose whether they use ‘conflict
minerals’ and whether these minerals originate in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or an adjoining country. In
such a case, the company must submit a ‘Conflict Minerals
Report’ describing the measures taken to exercise due
diligence, the description of the products and the facilities used
to process them, the country of origin of the conflict minerals,
and the efforts to determine the mine or location of origin with
the greatest possible specificity. - A California law that took effect in 2012 requires covered
companies to disclose information regarding their efforts to
eradicate human trafficking and slavery within their supply chains.
The law applies to retail sellers and manufacturers that do
business in California and have annual worldwide gross receipts
exceeding USD 100 million. These companies must disclose the extent
of their efforts in five areas: verification, audits,
certification, internal accountability, and training. - The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which was
signed into Federal law on 23 December 2021, establishes a
rebuttable presumption that the importation of any goods mined,
produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in China’s Xinjiang
Uyghur Autonomous Region, or produced by certain entities, is
prohibited. The presumption applies unless the Commissioner of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection determines that the importer of
record has complied with specified conditions and that the goods
were not produced using forced labour. - A longstanding Federal tariff act prohibits the importation of
all goods and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly
or in part in any foreign country by forced labour, convict labour,
and/or indentured labour under penal sanctions, including forced
child labour. This law is enforced by the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. CBP has the authority to investigate, issue orders and
findings, and impose civil penalties against domestic companies to
prevent merchandise produced using forced labour in the supply
chain from being imported into the United States. https://www.cbp.gov/trade/forced-labor - The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has fully
enforceable labour standards, including enforcement of laws
regarding forced labour and child labour. USMCA also includes new
provisions that require the parties to take measures to prohibit
the importation of goods produced by forced labour, including
forced child labour, to address violence against workers exercising
their labour rights, to address sex-based discrimination in the
workplace, and to ensure that migrant workers are protected under
labour laws. - A 2015 Federal contracting rule strengthens the existing
prohibition against trafficking in government contracts by
expressly prohibiting Federal contractors, contractor employees,
subcontractors, and subcontractor employees from engaging in
specific types of trafficking-related activities. These include
destroying and confiscating identity documents, using misleading
recruitment practices, failing to provide return transportation
costs upon the end of employment in most situations, failing to
provide an employment contract in writing, providing housing that
fails to meet standards, and charging employees recruitment fees.
Additionally, where contracts that exceed USD 500,000 are performed
outside the United States, contractors must develop a compliance
plan with an employee awareness program, a process for employee
reporting of violations, a housing plan, and a wage and hour plan.
Such contractors must certify annually that they are implementing
their plans, and that neither they or their subcontractors have
engaged in the prohibited practices, or that if violations are
found in their supply chain that they have taken appropriate
remedial and referral actions. - A 1999 Executive Order requires the U.S. Department of Labor to
publish a List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child
Labor and their countries of origin. This List is intended to
ensure that U.S. federal agencies do not procure goods made by
forced or indentured child labour. Under procurement regulations,
federal contractors who supply products on the List must certify
that they have made a good faith effort to determine whether forced
or indentured child labour was used to produce the items
supplied.
Recent proposed legislation relating to supply chain
transparency includes:
- The Slave-Free Business Certification Act of 2022, which was
recently introduced in the U.S. Senate, would require any publicly
traded mining or manufacturing entity with annual worldwide gross
receipts that exceed USD 500 million to conduct an audit of its
supply chain, to investigate the presence or use of forced labour
by the company or its suppliers. Covered companies would be
required to submit and publish a report containing the results of
the audit and the company’s efforts to eradicate forced labour
from the supply chain. - The Corporate Governance Improvement and Investor Protection
Act was passed by the House in June 2021 and is currently before a
Senate This Act would require publicly traded companies to
periodically disclose information related to (among other things)
environmental, social, and governance performance metrics;
expenditures for certain political activities; compensation
information regarding executive officers and employees; tax
jurisdiction, income, and assets of constituent entities on a
country-by-country basis; and manufacturing activity in China’s
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Employment and HR from United States

